Option #1: de Havilland’s Falling Comet—Case Study 7.1
Read the de Havilland’s Falling Comet case study in your textbook (Case Study 7.1) and submit an article critique. In your article critique, address the following:
- Analyze the case study in context of the Project Risk Analysis and Management (PRAM) framework based on the key concepts, ideas, and perspectives that appear in course readings. How are these relevant to your work? How will they impact your work as a PM?
- Make specific connections between course reading(s) and your personal/business experiences. How can this be applied in the workplace?
- Pose questions and identify concerns that will help you develop a deeper understanding of ideas embedded in the readings, such as, what strategies were overlooked, missing, incomplete or underdeveloped?
Submit a two- to three-page paper, not including the title page and reference page.
Your paper must adhere to APA Requirements for APA formatting and style. Include at least two outside references (not including your textbook) to support your thinking.